Close

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 35
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472


    Yes Reputation No

    W212 E63 S 4Matic runs 10.3@130 in the 1/4 mile with Pure Stage 2 M157 turbo upgrade and meth injection

    People wanted to see 1/4 mile times for Pure Turbos Stage 2 upgraded M157's. Well, here they are. How does a 10.39 @ 130.92 sound? This was achieved at 25-27 psi of boost with 840 all wheel horsepower which the dyno run of was posted in an article early this year.

    Click here to enlarge

    Here are all the runs:

    Click here to enlarge

    Click here to enlarge

    The trap speed dropped hard on the 10.39 run. This is a bit odd considering a 10.42 run resulted in a 137.60 trap. A better 60 foot can lower the trap speed but not by almost seven miles per hour. Perhaps the car was a bit warm at that point?

    Regardless, this is a low 10 second W212 E63 that traps up to 138 miles per hour. A seriously quick luxury performance sedan.

    Precision Tuning has it running well and methanol injection is helping greatly. The car is still on the stock M157 motor and stock transmission to boot. How much longer the transmission can cope with these launches and the torque is anyone's guess.

    So, who will be the first to get a W212 E63 into the 9's?

    BRAND NEW IN BOX 991.2 standard/non-pse SPW cat bypass pipe for sale - $899 shipped

    New generic 991.2 PSE bypass pipes - $499 shipped

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Tampa Bay Area, FL
    Posts
    199
    Rep Points
    650.1
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    7


    Yes Reputation No
    Impressive. Maybe it ran out of meth and the IATs shot up hence the trap speed drop off?

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,060
    Rep Points
    1,685.1
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17


    Yes Reputation No
    10.66 with 670whp
    10.39 with 840whp

    If the golden rule is 100hp = 0.1 ET then this car should have only gained two tenths but it nearly gained three, 2.7.

    9's with weight reduction and drag radials

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Tampa Bay Area, FL
    Posts
    199
    Rep Points
    650.1
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    7


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Bowser330 Click here to enlarge
    10.66 with 670whp
    10.39 with 840whp

    If the golden rule is 100hp = 0.1 ET then this car should have only gained two tenths but it nearly gained three, 2.7.

    9's with weight reduction and drag radials
    I've never seen 100 wheel gain only gain a tenth in ET.
    Current: 2013 GTR (8.62 @ 161) 2016 Tesla Model X (11.6 @ 114) - 2013 ML63 (Tuned by Renntech 12.0 @ 116) - 2000 E46 (SBC & F1R) 2003 S600 (Dad's DD Tuned)
    Past: 2011 Cayenne Turbo - 2006 Cayenne Turbo (catless and tuned) 2002 Z06 (Heads/Cam/Nitrous)
    Past: 2002 BMW M3 (AA Gen 7) - 2006 BMW M5 - 93 FD RX-7 (T66) - 88 FC RX-7 (LS1) - 90 FC RX-7

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by PianoProdigy Click here to enlarge
    I've never seen 100 wheel gain only gain a tenth in ET.
    I think he meant 10 whp = .1.

    That only works up to a point though and then the power requirements grow geometrically. Especially in the 10's and beyond.
    BRAND NEW IN BOX 991.2 standard/non-pse SPW cat bypass pipe for sale - $899 shipped

    New generic 991.2 PSE bypass pipes - $499 shipped

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,060
    Rep Points
    1,685.1
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17


    Yes Reputation No
    Doh!

    i think it's 100lbs or 10hp = 0.1ET

    i am sure you're right about diminishing return, but even so 170whp additional should give more than 0.27 second improvement....hmmmm

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    miami
    Posts
    425
    Rep Points
    876.2
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Bowser330 Click here to enlarge
    Doh!

    i think it's 100lbs or 10hp = 0.1ET

    i am sure you're right about diminishing return, but even so 170whp additional should give more than 0.27 second improvement....hmmmm
    the TCU torque limitations are holding this platform back currently (I own same car).. we can get great whp runs on the dyno in 5th gear, but on the street/track the tcu severely limits what power gets from engine to wheels in first couple of gears so basically we cant use much more than tune/downpipe power levels in first couple gears as tcu intrudes

    think about it, renntech was running similar times/trap (10.6/137) back in 2013 with their 700whp turbo kit and now we add 140 whp and get negligible improvement tells us that all that power isnt getting used on the strip

    a tcu tune/ trq limits raised by gear is what the M157 platform needs now otherwise all the extra power just gets thrown away by the TCU as the trq limiters seem to be pretty severe in 1-3rd gear

  8. #8
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Tampa Bay Area, FL
    Posts
    199
    Rep Points
    650.1
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    7


    Yes Reputation No
    Seems Renntech claims to now have the ability to tune the TCU.

    https://www.renntechmercedes.com/ind...2-9-suv-detail
    Current: 2013 GTR (8.62 @ 161) 2016 Tesla Model X (11.6 @ 114) - 2013 ML63 (Tuned by Renntech 12.0 @ 116) - 2000 E46 (SBC & F1R) 2003 S600 (Dad's DD Tuned)
    Past: 2011 Cayenne Turbo - 2006 Cayenne Turbo (catless and tuned) 2002 Z06 (Heads/Cam/Nitrous)
    Past: 2002 BMW M3 (AA Gen 7) - 2006 BMW M5 - 93 FD RX-7 (T66) - 88 FC RX-7 (LS1) - 90 FC RX-7

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,060
    Rep Points
    1,685.1
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17


    Yes Reputation No
    I heard about the torque issue years ago and just assumed it had been taken care of....does anyone have the renntech software mentioned above?

    would a piggyback stacked on top of a flash be able to trick the transmissions torque limits? What I'm thinking is, that in this case the flash is almost telling too much information to the ecu/tcu and the tcu is not happy about the torque so it's limiting to a max allowable level, so you keep that level the flash tune level and then trick it with a piggyback the rest of the way.... just like the flash+piggy m5 tunes out there

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    miami
    Posts
    425
    Rep Points
    876.2
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by PianoProdigy Click here to enlarge
    Seems Renntech claims to now have the ability to tune the TCU.

    https://www.renntechmercedes.com/ind...2-9-suv-detail
    ive seen that but odd that they dont have it offered in their E63 section and only have it advertised under the suvs... weird thing is that tcu tune has a 722.6 code in its sku --->SKU: TCU:27.722.6.TS , while on their E63 section they have trans upgrade that is mecahnical (clutches etc) upgrade only (no tcu) and its sku has 722.9 code ---> SKU: Trans:27.722.9.7S


    kind of confusing since both are for the M157 engine and both should have the 722.9 trans

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Bowser330 Click here to enlarge
    but even so 170whp additional should give more than 0.27 second improvement....hmmmm
    What are you calculating .27 second improvement from?
    BRAND NEW IN BOX 991.2 standard/non-pse SPW cat bypass pipe for sale - $899 shipped

    New generic 991.2 PSE bypass pipes - $499 shipped

  12. #12
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Tampa Bay Area, FL
    Posts
    199
    Rep Points
    650.1
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    7


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    I'm going to have Renntech flash in the next few weeks and I'll report back

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,060
    Rep Points
    1,685.1
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17


    Yes Reputation No
    10.66 and then 10.39, the difference was 0.27 seconds of ET improvement

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,060
    Rep Points
    1,685.1
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by PianoProdigy Click here to enlarge
    I'm going to have Renntech flash in the next few weeks and I'll report back
    Awesome please remind us what car you have and your mods

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Bowser330 Click here to enlarge
    10.66 and then 10.39, the difference was 0.27 seconds of ET improvement
    Ah, I see. I think on the previous run they had these turbos too though, right? I think they just dialed down the power then to preserve the trans.
    BRAND NEW IN BOX 991.2 standard/non-pse SPW cat bypass pipe for sale - $899 shipped

    New generic 991.2 PSE bypass pipes - $499 shipped

  16. #16
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    Tampa Bay Area, FL
    Posts
    199
    Rep Points
    650.1
    Mentioned
    9 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    7


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Bowser330 Click here to enlarge
    Awesome please remind us what car you have and your mods
    2013 ML63, Renntech tune (flashed 4 years ago right after I got the car), plugs, BMC filters. I'm considering a turbo upgrade if I know the trans tune won't kill all the power down low and on the shifts like it does now
    Current: 2013 GTR (8.62 @ 161) 2016 Tesla Model X (11.6 @ 114) - 2013 ML63 (Tuned by Renntech 12.0 @ 116) - 2000 E46 (SBC & F1R) 2003 S600 (Dad's DD Tuned)
    Past: 2011 Cayenne Turbo - 2006 Cayenne Turbo (catless and tuned) 2002 Z06 (Heads/Cam/Nitrous)
    Past: 2002 BMW M3 (AA Gen 7) - 2006 BMW M5 - 93 FD RX-7 (T66) - 88 FC RX-7 (LS1) - 90 FC RX-7

  17. #17
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    miami
    Posts
    425
    Rep Points
    876.2
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    Ah, I see. I think on the previous run they had these turbos too though, right? I think they just dialed down the power then to preserve the trans.
    no ,the 10.66 was when they were on stock turbos with meth... i think that's why the +170 whp added from turbo upgrade and -.27 in et only is a little surprising ... would of though a bigger decrease in ET

    http://www.benzboost.com/showthread....n-the-1-4-mile

  18. #18
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by gaspam Click here to enlarge
    no ,the 10.66 was when they were on stock turbos with meth... i think that's why the +170 whp added from turbo upgrade and -.27 in et only is a little surprising ... would of though a bigger decrease in ET

    http://www.benzboost.com/showthread....n-the-1-4-mile
    Well it completely depends on the tune. I don't know if they ran the full power or not.

    Let's ask the tuner @kbaldi29
    BRAND NEW IN BOX 991.2 standard/non-pse SPW cat bypass pipe for sale - $899 shipped

    New generic 991.2 PSE bypass pipes - $499 shipped

  19. #19
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    187
    Rep Points
    296.2
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    The torque limitation in the TCU still present, but there is ways around those... Unfortunately the mechanical part of the car is something hard and near impossible to trick like we do with the ECU... In this case the clutch is something that is holding us back from faster times... We were pretty insisting with keeping the HP at the highest levels we dynoed the car on(+800whp) and the full weight of the car, but was impossible to get a full pass without having traction issue and or the clutch slipping 4th-5th gear. Sometimes big power doesnt get you as fast as you need so We were forced to bring the power down, only way We got the car to stay in shape for the most part of the run and actually get a decent pass... Top of the run boost still when higher than target and got some power reduction, which is why the the trap speed was lower.
    It was a desperate solution since We really didnt have much of a Tune for this car with lower power, so it obviously wasnt "dialed in" as we normally would like the car to be, but at the end gave us some kind of better result than spinning from the line and burning clutch on top of the track.

    As far as how much power less we used on this pass is anyone's guess without a dyno chart, but the solid fact I can give you all to kinda estimate is that we reduced the boost by 3-4 PSI and meth injection was turned off... regardless of meth being used only for safety still add some torque to the formula, so it was decided to be turned off.

    Needless to say... We are working on a solution and improvements to actually bring power up back to what it should be and actually see what the car can do without restrictions, maybe some weight reductions as well to help with the effort being made to move this heavy thing up the 1/4 mile.

  20. #20
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by kbaldi29 Click here to enlarge
    Needless to say... We are working on a solution and improvements to actually bring power up back to what it should be and actually see what the car can do without restrictions, maybe some weight reductions as well to help with the effort being made to move this heavy thing up the 1/4 mile.
    Thanks for clearing that up but what are these solutions?
    BRAND NEW IN BOX 991.2 standard/non-pse SPW cat bypass pipe for sale - $899 shipped

    New generic 991.2 PSE bypass pipes - $499 shipped

  21. #21
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    miami
    Posts
    425
    Rep Points
    876.2
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    9


    Yes Reputation No
    ^+1 ... whoever figures out a solution to the TCU intrusion will be getting a lot of love from the M157/722.9 MCT crowd as we are all waiting, and willing to hand over cash, for that solution... I know at least 6 guys (myself included) that want to do turbo upgrade on M157 but waiting for a tcu solution that prevents it intruding and from cutting out all the extra power

  22. #22
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,060
    Rep Points
    1,685.1
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by gaspam Click here to enlarge
    ^+1 ... whoever figures out a solution to the TCU intrusion will be getting a lot of love from the M157/722.9 MCT crowd as we are all waiting, and willing to hand over cash, for that solution... I know at least 6 guys (myself included) that want to do turbo upgrade on M157 but waiting for a tcu solution that prevents it intruding and from cutting out all the extra power
    +1, Not to mention the people that would jump on the platform for a 9 second capable family sedan with only four mods....Tune, Turbos, Dps and Meth....All in less than $10K in mods

  23. #23
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    187
    Rep Points
    296.2
    Mentioned
    88 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    3


    Yes Reputation No
    A clutch upgrade that actually works, a wheel/tire setup that allow us to get either higher trap speed and stay in 4th gear the whole 1/4 mile or be in 5th higher in the rpm than we currently are... the current setup is what you would consider completely the opposite from ideal, 5th gear under 5500 rpm torque gets a little too high.

  24. #24
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Posts
    2,060
    Rep Points
    1,685.1
    Mentioned
    23 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    17


    Yes Reputation No
    @kbaldi29

    you mentioned weight reduction in a previous post, what do you think could be saved by removing all seats and putting in a lightweight racing seat? 200lbs?

    What about a lighter battery? Is that do-able swap on the W212?

    If you had any suggestions for others on the platform that would be great!

  25. #25
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by gaspam Click here to enlarge
    whoever figures out a solution to the TCU intrusion will be getting a lot of love from the M157/722.9 MCT crowd as we are all waiting,
    Renntech says they have this solution...
    BRAND NEW IN BOX 991.2 standard/non-pse SPW cat bypass pipe for sale - $899 shipped

    New generic 991.2 PSE bypass pipes - $499 shipped

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •