Close

Page 11 of 21 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast
Results 251 to 275 of 520
  1. #251
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    1,201
    Rep Points
    1,236.0
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    13


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by idratherbesurfing Click here to enlarge
    A side note I was at a shop yesterday which I will not name and they had a prototype Borg Warner EFR and it is bigger than anything they produced now... All I have to say is that thing is the size of a picnic bench I don't know how these guys are getting it in our engine bay hahah. I think i also held the 9180? I forget the exact model but it was the biggest one they make. Its just absolutly massive. Really cant wait to see this kit done
    Should've taken a picture of the prototype turbo lol

  2. #252
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by idratherbesurfing Click here to enlarge
    A side note I was at a shop yesterday which I will not name and they had a prototype Borg Warner EFR and it is bigger than anything they produced now... All I have to say is that thing is the size of a picnic bench I don't know how these guys are getting it in our engine bay hahah. I think i also held the 9180? I forget the exact model but it was the biggest one they make. Its just absolutly massive. Really cant wait to see this kit done
    How can you make a post like this and not tell us the shop? I mean, it's cruel.

  3. #253
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    1,201
    Rep Points
    1,236.0
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    13


    Yes Reputation No
    That's what I'm saying. I've always wanted to put a park bench in my car.

  4. #254
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Nj
    Posts
    915
    Rep Points
    1,176.0
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    12


    Yes Reputation No
    Hahahahahahaha!! Im going to try and go back when they dyno test them and if they dont care ill spill the beans.

  5. #255
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Nj
    Posts
    915
    Rep Points
    1,176.0
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    12


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Fishayyy Click here to enlarge
    Should've taken a picture of the prototype turbo lol
    I dont want to be that guy that told everyone haha. Trying to make friends not enemies LOL

  6. #256
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Location
    www.BimmerMILVS.com
    Posts
    346
    Rep Points
    623.0
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    7


    3 out of 4 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    The Speed Steed manifolds are top rate. It would be great if they make this one for the BMW.
    It seem that they are making it for the BW EFR series turbochargers.

    With a slight change in the head mounting hole placements, it could fit the N54 and N55 as well as the N52.
    All 3 engines could use the same SS turbo manifold and use a smaller to bigger BW EFR turbos depending on the desired power level.

    I say build it and I will bolt it to my 328 N52 and use the BW 6255 or 6258 turbo, the little guy.
    I just need the manifold, BW EFR turbo and a downpipe.

  7. #257
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Clearwater, Florida
    Posts
    904
    Rep Points
    1,028.8
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    11


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    How can you make a post like this and not tell us the shop? I mean, it's cruel.
    CES Motorsport maybe???

  8. #258
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Nj
    Posts
    915
    Rep Points
    1,176.0
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    12


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Ericbh77 Click here to enlarge
    CES Motorsport maybe???
    No its not them...i dont even know where theyre from. Im stopping back at that shop this week to pick up more c85. This shop is actually in PA

  9. #259
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    1,201
    Rep Points
    1,236.0
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    13


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by idratherbesurfing Click here to enlarge
    No its not them...i dont even know where theyre from. Im stopping back at that shop this week to pick up more c85. This shop is actually in PA
    Are they even a part of the forums?

  10. #260
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    Nj
    Posts
    915
    Rep Points
    1,176.0
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    12


    Yes Reputation No
    Not that i know of. They arent really a bmw shop. I just went there to pick up some VP fuel and happened to see it. The turbo is going on a evo. Its a full track car

  11. #261
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Posts
    31
    Rep Points
    115.1
    Mentioned
    33 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    2


    2 out of 2 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    Looks like Steed Speed is getting closer. Posted to their facebook yesterday

    Click here to enlarge

  12. #262
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    ATL
    Posts
    3,192
    Rep Points
    2.1
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    Lots of people talking $#@! about it on the N5X FB group. "its not real twin scroll" "its not symmetrical so it will flow like $#@!" "its just a knock off of motiv" blah blah blah.
    I want to see real world results but looks good to me!

  13. #263
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    2,495
    Rep Points
    1,970.5
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by subaru335i Click here to enlarge
    Lots of people talking $#@! about it on the N5X FB group. "its not real twin scroll" "its not symmetrical so it will flow like $#@!" "its just a knock off of motiv" blah blah blah.
    I want to see real world results but looks good to me!
    It is actually correct twinscroll for these motors, that's the funny thing. Look at twinscroll supra manifolds, they are the same way =)

    The unequal length will hurt it vs. a true equal length twinscroll manifold, but it's all that would fit the EFR I suppose.

  14. #264
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Posts
    1,201
    Rep Points
    1,236.0
    Mentioned
    13 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    13


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by jyamona@motiv Click here to enlarge
    It is actually correct twinscroll for these motors, that's the funny thing. Look at twinscroll supra manifolds, they are the same way =)

    The unequal length will hurt it vs. a true equal length twinscroll manifold, but it's all that would fit the EFR I suppose.
    I was curious as to why the chose to make it unsymmetrical. Is that the only way to make a twinscroll log-style manifold work on this car?

  15. #265
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    2,495
    Rep Points
    1,970.5
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Fishayyy Click here to enlarge
    I was curious as to why the chose to make it unsymmetrical. Is that the only way to make a twinscroll log-style manifold work on this car?
    Only way to get the EFR with internal wastegate to fit, as they are huge. You could definitely make an equal length one for a normal TS T4 turbo, and say place the waste gates on top of the manifold. That would fit fine, but WG placement wouldn't be ideal and would hurt flow a bit. You could also use a single WG for a TS turbo, as long as it is divided up to the WG flange.

  16. #266
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Encino,CA
    Posts
    9,962
    Rep Points
    8,426.4
    Mentioned
    311 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    85


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by jyamona@motiv Click here to enlarge
    That would fit fine, but WG placement wouldn't be ideal and would hurt flow a bit.
    With the back pressure that thing would make, I doubt you'd have trouble.
    Burger Motorsports
    Home of the Worlds fastest N20s, N54s, N55s, S55s, N63s, and S63s!

    It is the sole responsibility of the purchaser and installer of any BMS part to employ the correct installation techniques required to ensure the proper operation of BMS parts, and BMS disclaims any and all liability for any part failure due to improper installation or use. It is the sole responsibility of the customer to verify that the use of their vehicle and items purchased comply with federal, state and local regulations. BMS claims no legal federal, state or local certification concerning pollution controlled motor vehicles or mandated emissions requirements. BMS products labeled for use only in competition racing vehicles may only be used on competition racing vehicles operated exclusively on a closed course in conjunction with a sanctioned racing event, in accordance with all federal and state laws, and may never be operated on public roads/highways. Please click here for more information on legal requirements related to use of BMS parts.

  17. #267
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Hayward, CA
    Posts
    9,218
    Rep Points
    3,666.1
    Mentioned
    349 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    You guys should all jump on the Cummins Forums, and let all the guys making 900WHP, and 1800LBS of TQ that an asymmetrical manifold is not as true twin scroll, and is restrictive. I honestly love this place, but so many "experts" by way of reading things on the internet. No offense to the people I like.

  18. #268
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Hayward, CA
    Posts
    9,218
    Rep Points
    3,666.1
    Mentioned
    349 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    I mean $#@!, here is the "crappy" cast version making 700WHP, and 1350 WTQ, the flange is all the one to one end. What are the "experts" going to say about that?

    Click here to enlarge

  19. #269
    Join Date
    Jul 2013
    Location
    Clearwater, Florida
    Posts
    904
    Rep Points
    1,028.8
    Mentioned
    11 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    11


    Yes Reputation No
    @Fishayyy... That is not the only way to make a twin scroll bottom mount manifold. I have a tubular bottom mount twin scroll manifold instead of a log style.

  20. #270
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    434
    Rep Points
    694.0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    7


    Yes Reputation No
    Some interesting design features on their e36 twin scroll manifold, note single divided wastegate location/design and then 10.5-10.6 sec 1/4 mile, 138-142 MPH. Not too shabby.

    http://www.cesmotorsport.com/documents/66.html

    http://www.bimmerforums.com/forum/sh...l-E36-Manifold

  21. #271
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    2,495
    Rep Points
    1,970.5
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Tony@VargasTurboTech Click here to enlarge
    You guys should all jump on the Cummins Forums, and let all the guys making 900WHP, and 1800LBS of TQ that an asymmetrical manifold is not as true twin scroll, and is restrictive. I honestly love this place, but so many "experts" by way of reading things on the internet. No offense to the people I like.
    No one here said it wouldn't make power. No one here said it is not a true twinscroll manifold. It's simply not as ideal as a twinscroll manifold with equal length runners. There is always some gains to be had with true equal length runners, which is why companies go to such lengths to achieve it, but it would have to be tubular. A log style will never have completely equal lengths anyway, do to the nature of the log style.

  22. #272
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Hayward, CA
    Posts
    9,218
    Rep Points
    3,666.1
    Mentioned
    349 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by ajsalida Click here to enlarge
    Some interesting design features on their e36 twin scroll manifold, note single divided wastegate location/design and then 10.5-10.6 sec 1/4 mile, 138-142 MPH. Not too shabby.

    http://www.cesmotorsport.com/documents/66.html

    http://www.bimmerforums.com/forum/sh...l-E36-Manifold
    Thing is working, and working well. That dyno is very comparable to our Stock Frame 700WHP dyno, not bad for an older GTX35R, on 109. That really is great spool, and power for 26psi. Overlaid it just for fun. Curves are remarkably similar, but that thing is making smooth early power. 686 graph is with vanos tuning the 699 run has OTS vanos. This is a great example of what a properly set up 700WHP E9X should be running in the 1/4 mile. Mid 10's at 140MPH.

    Click here to enlarge

  23. #273
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Hayward, CA
    Posts
    9,218
    Rep Points
    3,666.1
    Mentioned
    349 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by jyamona@motiv Click here to enlarge
    A log style will never have completely equal lengths anyway, do to the nature of the log style.
    So the point is? As this is essentially a good flowing log style, and as is the manifold you guys sell. The point is, lots of internet experts to pick $#@! apart, when the company actually invented that manifold design, and has been making them for years. This thing will work fine. I do not think its ideal personally, but everyone is a $#@! talker on the sidelines, while building nothing themselves. Obviously not you J. You have done as much as anyone to push this platform forward.

  24. #274
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    2,495
    Rep Points
    1,970.5
    Mentioned
    204 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Tony@VargasTurboTech Click here to enlarge
    So the point is? As this is essentially a good flowing log style, and as is the manifold you guys sell. The point is, lots of internet experts to pick $#@! apart, when the company actually invented that manifold design, and has been making them for years. This thing will work fine. I do not think its ideal personally, but everyone is a $#@! talker on the sidelines, while building nothing themselves. Obviously not you J. You have done as much as anyone to push this platform forward.
    No point really, just stated as it's the only leg the FB ppl have to stand on if dissing this. But it's inherent to the log, so really they have no legs. And I agree, way too many people judging anymore without doing $#@! themselves =)

  25. #275
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Posts
    434
    Rep Points
    694.0
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    7


    1 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Tony@VargasTurboTech Click here to enlarge
    Thing is working, and working well. That dyno is very comparable to our Stock Frame 700WHP dyno, not bad for an older GTX35R, on 109. That really is great spool, and power for 26psi. Overlaid it just for fun. Curves are remarkably similar, but that thing is making smooth early power. 686 graph is with vanos tuning the 699 run has OTS vanos. This is a great example of what a properly set up 700WHP E9X should be running in the 1/4 mile. Mid 10's at 140MPH.

    Click here to enlarge
    Have to agree with you. That spool caught my eye for sure. Just for fun, speaking of twins, here's ICS twin GT3076r e36, 1142 WHP, friggin' nuts. 223 MPH standing mile with LESS power:

    http://porscheboost.com/content.php?...-wheels&page=2

Page 11 of 21 FirstFirst ... 910111213 ... LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •