Close

Results 1 to 3 of 3
  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472


    Yes Reputation No

    2016 Cadillac CTS-V vs. Lexus GS F comparison test AKA why even bother with the Lexus?

    Lexus with their 2016 GS F basically gets a sport sedan participation award. This website mocked the GS F as arriving in time to fight in last generation's luxury mid-size sport sedan battle. It honestly isn't even good enough to come out on top with the previous gen cars let alone the current crop of forced induction beasts.

    Click here to enlarge

    Why even bother comparing the CTS-V to the GS F? The Lexus actually would stack up better against the CTS V-Sport and its 420 horsepower 3.6 liter twin turbo V6 except the V-Sport also saves you $25k to boot. If I were Cadillac I'd be insulted that a weak bottom feeder like the GS F is being compared to arguably the best in class CTS-V.

    Look at these numbers. It's a joke. The CTS-V has almost 200 more horsepower and 240 lb-ft more torque which also arrives a hell of a lot earlier thanks to the blower.

    The GS F has a smaller 5.0 liter naturally aspirated V8. It isn't even good enough to top BMW's last generation 5.0 liter S85 V10 which has more power at 507 horses (and a better torque curve with higher revs) or the Mercedes-AMG M156 6.2 liter naturally aspirated V8. Both naturally aspirated German engines have since been replaced by even more powerful twin turbo V8's. Did we mention the GS F engine is a joke?

    Especially when you factor in the GS F is the same money as the CTS V. Why would anyone opt for the GS F? Because they like stupid looking boy racer tailpipes and paying more money for less of a car? Maybe GS F owners are scared of torque?

    The Lexus can't even do a burnout. Which is nice of course so you can take a nap while at the wheel since the car will bore you to sleep.

    If you want to waste 26 minutes watching MotorTrend compare the two feel free. We have better things to do than entertain the absurd notion of a GS F being competition for the CTS-V.

    BRAND NEW IN BOX 991.2 standard/non-pse SPW cat bypass pipe for sale - $899 shipped

    New generic 991.2 PSE bypass pipes - $499 shipped

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Posts
    422
    Rep Points
    0.1
    Mentioned
    14 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    0 out of 1 members liked this post. Yes Reputation No
    GM just can't get the EASIEST stuff figured out.
    The ATS-V should have had the LT1 or LT4.
    The CTS-V should have had AWD, or AT LEAST, a stick.

    I would have bought any of the above.

    Instead, I was forced to buy a Chevy SS Sedan to get a pushrod V8, a stick, and 4 doors. Not to mention, I have to add an afternarket supercharger, and still deal with Chevy looks, and a Chevy dealer.....

    GM gets SOOOO close, but still misses the mark ALL THE TIME.
    When a GM fan boy like myself is only willing to buy ONE of their cars in 2016,
    GM is failing miserably.

    Bring on the 2nd Gen Alpha based SS Sedan, the mid-engine Corvette/Caddy, and a V-series with AWD, or AT LEAST a DCT.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by TT C6 Click here to enlarge
    The ATS-V should have had the LT1 or LT4.
    Click here to enlarge
    BRAND NEW IN BOX 991.2 standard/non-pse SPW cat bypass pipe for sale - $899 shipped

    New generic 991.2 PSE bypass pipes - $499 shipped

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •