Close

  • S63/S63TU: New BMW F10 M5 and S63TU platform horsepower record - Pure Stage 2 S63TU Turbo upgrade makes 847 rear wheel horsepower

    • Thread automatically updated every 5 second(s). Automatic thread refreshing has been stopped because you appear to be idle. Un-Idle - Reload
    Results 1 to 14 of 14
    1. 05-11-2016, 05:01 PM #1
      Sticky's Avatar
      Sticky is offline Regular User
      Join Date
      Jan 2010
      Location
      SoCal
      Posts
      148,075
      Rep Points
      47,180.7
      Mentioned
      2523 Post(s)
      Rep Power
      472

      Yes Reputation No

      New BMW F10 M5 and S63TU platform horsepower record - Pure Stage 2 S63TU Turbo upgrade makes 847 rear wheel horsepower

      Pure Turbos just continues to crush it on BMW platforms and especially the S63TU 4.4 liter V8 twin turbo motor under the hood of the F10 M5 and F13 M6. This is the same BMW F10 M5 that belongs to BimmerBoost member @allmotor_2000 who ran 9.9 @ 140 in the 1/4 mile.

      Click here to enlarge

      That was with the Stage 1 S63TU turbo charger upgrade from Pure Turbos and now he is moving to the Stage II. It is safe to say the Stage II turbos are potent as even early on in the tuning phase he already set a new record on the platform with a 847 wheel horsepower pull. Oh, and look at that torque figure. 862 lb-ft of torque at the wheels!

      How much further will things go from here? When will the fuel system become a liability? How much torque can the clutches take? Who knows. We will have to wait and see but things are looking bright.
      Quote Quote
    2. 05-11-2016, 05:10 PM #2
      bigdnno98's Avatar
      bigdnno98 is offline Member
      Join Date
      Dec 2011
      Location
      Wiesbaden, Germany
      Posts
      4,336
      Rep Points
      3,560.1
      Mentioned
      70 Post(s)
      Rep Power
      36

      Yes Reputation No
      Such an amazing motor and car.
      2016 340xi AT
      Quote Quote
    3. 05-11-2016, 09:13 PM #3
      The Ghost's Avatar
      The Ghost is offline Member
      Join Date
      Sep 2011
      Posts
      1,279
      Rep Points
      2,415.0
      Mentioned
      27 Post(s)
      Rep Power
      25

      Yes Reputation No
      800 ftlbs at 3k? Just imagine if they put a turbo with "normal" lag (400ft lbs at 4k)!

      Nuts
      C6 Z06 - 600whp+ (Chuck MF'ing Norris)
      '10 335i - 830whp (Bruce Lee)
      '07 335i - 380whp (Dolph Lundgren)
      Quote Quote
    4. 05-11-2016, 09:22 PM #4
      Sticky's Avatar
      Sticky is offline Regular User
      Join Date
      Jan 2010
      Location
      SoCal
      Posts
      148,075
      Rep Points
      47,180.7
      Mentioned
      2523 Post(s)
      Rep Power
      472
      Thread Starter


      Yes Reputation No
      Dynojet spool is different than spool with load.
      Quote Quote
    5. 05-11-2016, 09:26 PM #5
      ezec63 is offline Member
      Join Date
      Sep 2012
      Posts
      1,162
      Rep Points
      980.2
      Mentioned
      14 Post(s)
      Rep Power
      10

      Yes Reputation No
      Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by The Ghost Click here to enlarge
      800 ftlbs at 3k? Just imagine if they put a turbo with "normal" lag (400ft lbs at 4k)!

      Nuts
      The cross flow manifold + Hot V/twin scroll turbo that separates exhaust pulses also does wonders for turbo spool
      Quote Quote
    6. 05-11-2016, 09:35 PM #6
      Sticky's Avatar
      Sticky is offline Regular User
      Join Date
      Jan 2010
      Location
      SoCal
      Posts
      148,075
      Rep Points
      47,180.7
      Mentioned
      2523 Post(s)
      Rep Power
      472
      Thread Starter


      Yes Reputation No
      Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by ezec63 Click here to enlarge
      The cross flow manifold + Hot V/twin scroll turbo that separates exhaust pulses also does wonders for turbo spool
      Better engine than the M157 Click here to enlarge

      Just saying...
      Quote Quote
    7. 05-11-2016, 09:41 PM #7
      ezec63 is offline Member
      Join Date
      Sep 2012
      Posts
      1,162
      Rep Points
      980.2
      Mentioned
      14 Post(s)
      Rep Power
      10

      Yes Reputation No
      Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
      Better engine than the M157 Click here to enlarge

      Just saying...
      At this point I would have to agree the cross flow manifold allowing bigger turbos while offsetting lag is key. Then factor in the much better top end breathing from the heads/cam and it's a beast probably my favorite turbo motor out not counting exotics. To bad they have to attach it to a land yacht I can't imagine what this motor would do in a car like the AMG GTS they need to stick it in an i8.
      Quote Quote
    8. 05-11-2016, 09:49 PM #8
      Sticky's Avatar
      Sticky is offline Regular User
      Join Date
      Jan 2010
      Location
      SoCal
      Posts
      148,075
      Rep Points
      47,180.7
      Mentioned
      2523 Post(s)
      Rep Power
      472
      Thread Starter


      Yes Reputation No
      Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by ezec63 Click here to enlarge
      At this point I would have to agree the cross flow manifold allowing bigger turbos while offsetting lag is key. Then factor in the much better top end breathing from the heads/cam and it's a beast probably my favorite turbo motor out not counting exotics. To bad they have to attach it to a land yacht I can't imagine what this motor would do in a car like the AMG GTS they need to stick it in an i8.
      At least you're able to admit it. The AMG fanboys proclaimed victory before the M5 could even be tuned. I might write up an article on how wrong people were and how displacement isn't everything especially in the turbo era.

      It's a great motor and the best of the direct injected turbo V8's but Audi's 4.0 TFSI is a beast too. I also hate it's stuck in heavy cars.

      If they put it in the i8 that chassis would break. It's VERY soft to remain lightweight which is why the i8 Spyder has yet to launch.
      Quote Quote
    9. 05-11-2016, 11:17 PM #9
      gzim335 is offline Member
      Join Date
      Mar 2012
      Posts
      379
      Rep Points
      477.0
      Mentioned
      32 Post(s)
      Rep Power
      5

      Yes Reputation No
      m157s don't have a terry burger supporting the platform,our new setup made well over 700whp on racegas and meth fully done hybrids not the weistec garbage,similar to ams and renntech but is tuning limited as it can not run over 22psi hits some type of limiters according to tuner its a shame
      Quote Quote
    10. 05-11-2016, 11:44 PM #10
      KEMA is offline Member
      Join Date
      Apr 2011
      Posts
      162
      Rep Points
      199.6
      Mentioned
      2 Post(s)
      Rep Power
      2

      Yes Reputation No
      Amazing but how's traction with this nuclear powerplant? A tuned C63S spins the tires at 60+ MPH. I can only imagine what kind of rubber this beast requires.

      Ken
      Quote Quote
    11. 05-12-2016, 04:18 PM #11
      Sticky's Avatar
      Sticky is offline Regular User
      Join Date
      Jan 2010
      Location
      SoCal
      Posts
      148,075
      Rep Points
      47,180.7
      Mentioned
      2523 Post(s)
      Rep Power
      472
      Thread Starter


      Yes Reputation No
      Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by gzim335 Click here to enlarge
      m157s don't have a terry burger supporting the platform
      What does a piggyback have to do with anything? It's flashes making this happen.

      Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by gzim335 Click here to enlarge
      our new setup made well over 700whp on racegas and meth fully done hybrids not the weistec garbage
      Harsh considering the Weistec setup on your C63 and how it performs.
      Quote Quote
    12. 05-12-2016, 07:32 PM #12
      MSIZZLE is offline Member
      Join Date
      Apr 2010
      Posts
      1,419
      Rep Points
      1,179.6
      Mentioned
      7 Post(s)
      Rep Power
      12

      Yes Reputation No
      this platform will crack 1000whp this year
      Quote Quote
    13. 05-12-2016, 10:16 PM #13
      gzim335 is offline Member
      Join Date
      Mar 2012
      Posts
      379
      Rep Points
      477.0
      Mentioned
      32 Post(s)
      Rep Power
      5

      Yes Reputation No
      Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
      What does a piggyback have to do with anything? It's flashes making this happen.
      What flashes r making his happen?what flash out there targets 30psi which is needed to make this kind of power


      Harsh considering the Weistec setup on your C63 and how it performs.
      im talkin about the weistec m157 turbo upgrade which is a total fail barely 20whp gain from stock turbos n including my brothers car we have 2 more m157 with weistec turbos n they both didn't gain more than 20whp it's a joke
      bulletproof v2 weistec trans slipping after 500 miles on our e63 n weistec doesn't even answer their phone after we spent 30kplus with them
      Quote Quote
    14. 05-14-2016, 05:55 PM #14
      Terry@BMS is offline Supporting Vendor
      Join Date
      Nov 2009
      Location
      Simi Valley, CA
      Posts
      9,208
      Rep Points
      12,257.1
      Mentioned
      754 Post(s)
      Rep Power
      123

      Yes Reputation No
      Power is only going to go up on this car too. Currently busy hunting down restrictions. Click here to enlarge
      Burger Motorsports
      Home of the Worlds fastest N20s, N54s, N55s, N63s, S55s, and S63s!

      It is the sole responsibility of the purchaser and installer of any BMS part to employ the correct installation techniques required to ensure the proper operation of BMS parts, and BMS disclaims any and all liability for any part failure due to improper installation or use. It is the sole responsibility of the customer to verify that the use of their vehicle and items purchased comply with federal, state and local regulations. BMS claims no legal federal, state or local certification concerning pollution controlled motor vehicles or mandated emissions requirements. BMS products labeled for use only in competition racing vehicles may only be used on competition racing vehicles operated exclusively on a closed course in conjunction with a sanctioned racing event, in accordance with all federal and state laws, and may never be operated on public roads/highways. Please see http://www.burgertuning.com/emissions_info.html for more information on legal requirements related to use of BMS parts.
      Quote Quote
    Thread automatically updated every 5 second(s). Automatic thread refreshing has been stopped because you appear to be idle. Un-Idle - Reload
    « Previous Thread | Next Thread »

    Tags for this Thread

    Posting Permissions

    • You may not post new threads
    • You may post replies
    • You may not post attachments
    • You may not edit your posts
    •  

    Forum Rules