Don't let road rage get the best of you

[Sticky]

There happens to be a BMW involved in this video although it could happen to anyone and with any make of car. Maybe there is something though to the study that says BMW drivers are $#@!s? Regardless, this situation gets out of hand quickly.

What happens? Well, a group of guys on motorcycles are speeding and enjoying their ride when a classic BMW cuts one of them off and essentially takes issue with their style of riding. At one point in the video the BMW catches up when the riders are stopped.

The BMW driver gets out and tells the guy on the motorcycle not to move as he blocks his path. Well, the rider takes issue as do his friends and the guy gets what is coming to him which is an ass beating.

The three bikers probably feel tough until the passenger jumps out with a gun. The bikers back off and the passenger should be happy none of the bikers were armed or this situation would have escalated well beyond reason.

The camera guy gets the hell out of there but screaming continues in the background. It's simply best to leave patrolling the highways and enforcing the speed limit to law enforcement.

[G0TB00ST?]

Wow that was hard to watch lost of peopel in the wrong here IMO. When he got cut off I almost $#@! myself, that has happened to me before and it's not a good feeling. I get where both groups are coming from I hate it when I'm around people riding reckless (even though I have been that guy far too often), but I would not try to take matters into my own hands risking someones life to slow them down. That guy should have stayed in his car and called the cops if he felt that threatened. The motorcycle guys really shouldn't have started swinging, that guy can stand in the way all day long, but he's not stopping that bike. Lucky no one got shot by ole chick in the end... come on people lets share the road and keep an eye out for each other

[Sticky]

Wow that was hard to watch lost of peopel in the wrong here IMO. When he got cut off I almost $#@! myself, that has happened to me before and it's not a good feeling. I get where both groups are coming from I hate it when I'm around people riding reckless (even though I have been that guy far too often), but I would not try to take matters into my own hands risking someones life to slow them down. That guy should have stayed in his car and called the cops if he felt that threatened. The motorcycle guys really shouldn't have started swinging, that guy can stand in the way all day long, but he's not stopping that bike. Lucky no one got shot by ole chick in the end... come on people lets share the road and keep an eye out for each other

Yep that was a mess. I'm thinking the BMW owner wouldn't have done what he did if he knew there wasn't a gun in the car. He decided to play vigilante like an idiot not to mention he could have hit one of those bikers and killed them easily.

He escalated it and then the bikers responded and then, well, a gun got pulled. Speeding bikers is no reason to take the law into your hands.

[Stevenh]

Was I the only one hoping to a see a semi lose its brakes and take out everyone involved before that video was over? Idiots, all around.

[MSIZZLE]

guys anybody find it weird how nobody really reacted to the gun?? They just casually got back on their bikes

[ricecrackers101]

this is why you americans need to have stricter gun control laws. so retards like that chick don't have easy access to them

[Sticky]

this is why you americans need to have stricter gun restrictions. so retards like that chick don't have easy access to them

One could argue if she didn't have the gun they would have kept beating on the guy and who knows what damage he would suffer.

If jumped by three bikers I'd like to be armed.

[MSIZZLE]

Jumped?? He ran them down, stopped them, blocked their bikes, then got beat up. "jumped" suggests some kind of victim, this $#@! put him self in harms way and really his lady too. I behave extra better when with my girl because I would HATE to do something that can bring any harm to her. Like a murder charge

[Sticky]

Jumped??

If I was jumped not if I was in that particular situation. My point is defending myself from superior numbers. You're equating it to that specific situation when I'm talking about self-defense.

[ricecrackers101]

<p>

One could argue if she didn&#39;t have the gun they would have kept beating on the guy and who knows what damage he would suffer. If jumped by three bikers I&#39;d like to be armed.

he deserved to get his ass kicked for getting out of his car and trying to hold the biker in one spot. but my point is, she shouldnt be in possession of a firearm. she obviously doesn&#39;t know how to hold a gun, shes holding it low and aiming it blindly. she could be aiming at her own husband and wouldn&#39;t even know it. also, they stopped hitting him once he fell and looked to be backing off, she only pulled the gun after they stopped</p>

[Sticky]

he deserved to get his ass kicked for getting out of his car and trying to hold the biker in one spot. but my point is, she shouldnt be in possession of a firearm. she obviously doesn't know how to hold a gun, shes holding it low and aiming it blindly.

She doesn't know how to use it but just pulling it out got the bikers the hell out of there in a hurry. Their entire demeanor went from 'we're badass' to 'oh $#@! let's back off' just like that.

also, they stopped hitting him once he fell and looked to be backing off, she only pulled the gun after they stopped

She probably went for the gun as soon as he got hit. There was no way to know if it was going to end just because he hit the ground.

If the gun wasn't in play I'm not sure we can say what would have happened.

[ms335i]

Good looking BMW

[ricecrackers101]

if she doesn't know how to use one then she shouldn't have one. simple as that. giving a gun to someone who doesn't have proper training causes more harm than good. if she pulled the trigger she could have hit her husband or even an innocent bystander. theres no need for guns, its only in america that people are obsessed with them thinking it makes life safer if they have one. i've spent alot of time in america, canada, and the uk. i feel the least safe in america just because of the fact that anyone around me have a handgun on them at any time. while in canada and the uk, 99% of the population wont have a gun because of the gun control laws. the other two countries also have much lower crime and murder rates. guns dont equal safety. its quite the opposite

[Sticky]

if she pulled the trigger she could have hit her husband or even an innocent bystander.

She didn't need to pull the trigger.

feel the least safe in america just because of the fact that anyone around me have a handgun on them at any time

What state were you in? Texas? Because gun laws are out of control anywhere else.

I'd have to jump through a billion hoops to be able to carry in California.

while in canada and the uk, 99% of the population wont have a gun because of the gun control laws. the other two countries also have much lower crime and murder rates. guns dont equal safety. its quite the opposite

The other countries aren't as close to Mexico and don't have as large or diverse populations. Canada only has to worry about violence when one of their hockey teams loses.

Your view it typical Canadian.

[ricecrackers101]

She didn't need to pull the trigger.



What state were you in? Texas? Because gun laws are out of control anywhere else.

I'd have to jump through a billion hoops to be able to carry in California.



The other countries aren't as close to Mexico and don't have as large or diverse populations. Canada only has to worry about violence when one of their hockey teams loses.

Your view it typical Canadian.

Never been to texas or cali. I'm usually in florida when I go to america, making stops along the eastern states on my way there and back. And from what I understand gun control is basically non existant in florida, correct me if im wrong. even if she didn't need to pull the trigger she could have pulled it whether it be intentional or by accident. just because she didn't doesn't mean there wasn't a chance someone could have been killed during that incident. my view isn't just canadian. most countries in europe, japan, south korea, and australia. basically most of the developed countries in the world make it very difficult for civilians to own handguns, let alone carry them in public. so i don't think my view is just canadian

[Sticky]

And from what I understand gun control is basically non existant in florida, correct me if im wrong.

I don't live in Florida. I don't know their rules on guns but I'm sure people here do.

just because she didn't doesn't mean there wasn't a chance someone could have been killed during that inciden

Just because there isn't a gun doesn't mean someone can't be beaten to death.

my view isn't just canadian. most countries in europe, japan, south korea, and australia. basically most of the developed countries in the world make it very difficult for civilians to own handguns, let alone carry them in public. so i don't think my view is just canadian

Have you been to Japan? You can literally leave your wallet out on the table, leave, come back, and it will still be there. The Japanese don't just allow tons of immigrants in with different values who refuse to assimilate and they are an island nation.

You can't just apply laws from other countries in different areas with different cultures and different populations to the United States as a whole.

I just said it is very difficult to actually carry a gun in California. The rules vary considerably state by state.

I will tell you this though I believe the 2nd Amendment is a very correct philosophy and I have no idea how states are allowed to limit it. If I were in a situation where multiple people were trying to do me harm I'd prefer to have a gun. You can try to diffuse the situation by talking about Japan or Europe I guess and see if that protects you.

[ricecrackers101]

I don't live in Florida. I don't know their rules on guns but I'm sure people here do.



Just because there isn't a gun doesn't mean someone can't be beaten to death.



Have you been to Japan? You can literally leave your wallet out on the table, leave, come back, and it will still be there. The Japanese don't just allow tons of immigrants in with different values who refuse to assimilate and they are an island nation.

You can't just apply laws from other countries in different areas with different cultures and different populations to the United States as a whole.

I just said it is very difficult to actually carry a gun in California. The rules vary considerably state by state.

I will tell you this though I believe the 2nd Amendment is a very correct philosophy and I have no idea how states are allowed to limit it. If I were in a situation where multiple people were trying to do me harm I'd prefer to have a gun. You can try to diffuse the situation by talking about Japan or Europe I guess and see if that protects you.

I've been there twice, very interesting country. if you look at the number of gun related deaths each year in america and compare it to any country that has strict gun control. you will see how big the difference is. if you don't think guns are a problem in america then i guess you just have a typical american view of the issue as opposed to my "canadian" view
but in the end we are all entitled to our own opinion

[Sticky]

if you look at the number of gun related deaths each year in america and compare it to any country that has strict gun control. you will see how big the difference is.

I hate to say it but if you look in depth at who the deaths involve you will see a bit of a pattern.

if you don't think guns are a problem in america then i guess you just have a typical american view of the issue as opposed to my "canadian" view

I'm not saying there aren't problems with gun violence but I am saying the 2nd Amendment is avery correct philosophy.

We're living at a time where the government is more powerful than ever. I see no reason to strengthen the government further by disarming the populace. I don't know what that accomplishes but I'm sure they love there are proponents of that like yourself.

[ricecrackers101]

I hate to say it but if you look in depth at who the deaths involve you will see a bit of a pattern.



I'm not saying there aren't problems with gun violence but I am saying the 2nd Amendment is avery correct philosophy.

We're living at a time where the government is more powerful than ever. I see no reason to strengthen the government further by disarming the populace. I don't know what that accomplishes but I'm sure they love there are proponents of that like yourself.

I dont know what the statistics are, but I'm sure its safe to say that most are gang or drug related. but you have to admit there are alot of mass shootings that aren't related to gangs or drugs. also i dont understand what you mean by strengthening the government by disarming the population.

[Sticky]

but I'm sure its safe to say that most are gang or drug related. but you have to admit there are alot of mass shootings that aren't related to gangs or drugs.

They are, yes, and I don't see how limiting citizen's rights to bear arms will stop criminals from breaking the law.

I don't know if 'a lot' of mass shootings is accurate but I'd argue you sooner stop a mass shooter with force than you do by preaching to them about Japan.

also i dont understand what you mean by strengthening the government by disarming the population.

You have to understand the history of the 2nd Amendment and guns in America to really understand.

The olive branch didn't work with the Crown of England. Force did. That is how America was freed and that partially is why Americans are such strong proponents of gun ownership.

[ricecrackers101]

They are, yes, and I don't see how limiting citizen's rights to bear arms will stop criminals from breaking the law.

I don't know if 'a lot' of mass shootings is accurate but I'd argue you sooner stop a mass shooter with force than you do by preaching to them about Japan.



You have to understand the history of the 2nd Amendment and guns in America to really understand.

The olive branch didn't work with the Crown of England. Force did. That is how America was freed and that partially is why Americans are such strong proponents of gun ownership.

if guns weren't easily accessible then where would the mass shooters get their weapons from? V-tech is a good example. a man with known mental problems was legally allowed to buy multiple guns and a huge stockpile of ammo which he then used to shoot up his school. from what i read the san bernardino shooters had legally obtained guns as well. it seems like you're the one preaching about japan. i mentioned it once along with a bunch of other countries. canada, unlike japan, is a country composed of mostly immigrants. we have many of different cultures living together in the same cities and neighborhoods. having multiple cultures does not create crime and violence. since earlier you said something along the line of japan being so civilized because they only accept their own culture and not allowing immigrants. i admit we do have more crime than japan does. but our crime rates are still very low even with so many different types of people living together

[Sticky]

if guns weren't easily accessible then where would the mass shooters get their weapons from?

Where do people illegally procure weapons now? You think someone who intends to go on a rampage is going to follow gun laws?

from what i read the san bernardino shooters had legally obtained guns as well. it seems like you're the one preaching about japan.

So it's the fault of the gun and not the people who did it? You will never have a 100% safe system.

Didn't some guy in Norway get a gun (strict gun control laws) and kill 60+ people until Police arrived hours later with guns to stop him?

having multiple cultures does not create crime and violence. since earlier you said something along the line of japan being so civilized because they only accept their own culture and not allowing immigrants. i admit we do have more crime than japan does. but our crime rates are still very low even with so many different types of people living together

Yes, different people from different backgrounds often causes conflict. Japan is mostly Japanese and they are very respectful and civilized. You can't apply that to a nation with hundreds of millions more people from various backgrounds and cultures.

The San Bernardino shooters are a perfect example. Islamist extremists. You would probably get further by not allowing these people in the country than you would by banning guns.

Canada is mostly whitewashed and isolated. It's easy to preach from there.

[DavidV]

There is no way you will ever convince a Republican USA citicen that less guns is a good thing. Never ever.
They will always find a reason to get more heavily armed.

Like

The olive branch didn't work with the Crown of England. Force did. That is how America was freed and that partially is why Americans are such strong proponents of gun ownership.

This was in the 1800's right?

The other countries aren't as close to Mexico and don't have as large or diverse populations

A, you need a gun because of the diverse polulation. That makes sense.

I see no reason to strengthen the government further by disarming the populace.

So knowing you can shoot a police officer makes them feel better.

You see, there is no good arument.
The USA has mass shootings on a daily basis

Didn't some guy in Norway get a gun (strict gun control laws) and kill 60+ people until Police arrived hours later with guns to stop him?

So Norway has had one (1 !) shooting incident, basically since the second World War. I dare you to name one other. Go Google, I know you will.

The San Bernardino shooters are a perfect example. Islamist extremists.

This is probably the first shooting in the USA where Islamic Extremists were involved. How is this a perfect example of a shooting in the USA for bearing arms?

The USA citiicens have killed more citicens themselves amoungst eachother with firearms than USA soldiers were killed in all of their wars.
Houray for legalizing guns.
There are more people in prison per head of the polulation in teh USA than anywhere in the world

And yet, there is no statistic that can convince anyone to lay down their arms.
They are a war going nation. At home and abroad. Best to leave it at that.

[ricecrackers101]

Where do people illegally procure weapons now? You think someone who intends to go on a rampage is going to follow gun laws?



So it's the fault of the gun and not the people who did it? You will never have a 100% safe system.

Didn't some guy in Norway get a gun (strict gun control laws) and kill 60+ people until Police arrived hours later with guns to stop him?



Yes, different people from different backgrounds often causes conflict. Japan is mostly Japanese and they are very respectful and civilized. You can't apply that to a nation with hundreds of millions more people from various backgrounds and cultures.

The San Bernardino shooters are a perfect example. Islamist extremists. You would probably get further by not allowing these people in the country than you would by banning guns.

Canada is mostly whitewashed and isolated. It's easy to preach from there.

no offense but you sound like the type of person who shows up at trump rallies. yes islamic extremists are a big problem in the world today. but that doesn't mean all muslims or people with brown skin are terrorists. the extremists are few and far between. most shootings in america are not committed by immigrants or colored people. they are done by people born in the country, including alot of white people. remember Dylan Storm Roof? he was the white guy who shot up a black church just because they are black. or columbine, a couple white kids decided to shoot up a school. how about that armed militia in Oregon who took over a united states federal building. in my eyes that right there is an act of domestic terrorism. but your news outlets don't portray it that way because the perpetrators were white americans.

like David said, Norway had one mass shooting in the past 60+ years. while america has many mass shootings each year. its because your laws allow so many guns to be easily obtained by just about anyone. guns will always be smuggled into any country. but that doesnt change the fact that gun control laws to prevent ALOT of gun violence because most of the guns used in shootings in america are legally bought.

canada is far from white washed. have you ever been to Toronto or Vancouver? the two cities with the biggest populations in the country, both which are equally multicultural as NYC yet we have very low murder rates. why? because of the lack of guns available to the public.

[Forced Air]

Jebus....yea they were speeding...that idiot in the BMW almost killed someone several times though. And his wife is lucky no one else was armed...brandishing is usually illegal and a good way to get shot.