Close

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 40 of 40
  1. #26
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    ATL
    Posts
    3,192
    Rep Points
    2.1
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    People buy tiny little turbo diesels because the tax is lower based on displacement.
    I think it depends on the country but in sweden the tax isn't based on displacement it is CO2 emissions.

  2. #27
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by subaru335i Click here to enlarge
    I think it depends on the country but in sweden the tax isn't based on displacement it is CO2 emissions.
    Absolutely but the point ultimately is they have tiny little motors to have those emissions.

    Not to mention their cars are about the size of an American lawnmower.

  3. #28
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    1,108
    Rep Points
    1,407.0
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    15


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    Absolutely but the point ultimately is they have tiny little motors to have those emissions.

    Not to mention their cars are about the size of an American lawnmower.
    EU car tax tries to favour low emission cars in each class, you probably never seen a Audi Q7 with the V12 500hp diesel in the US, not in production anymore but hardly a "tiny" engine.

    Size for size diesels have higher hp/tq numbers at lower CO2 emissions.

    European cities are built mostly before the car was invented, it is seriously impractical to drive large cars. And pick-up's are considered lorry's here i.e. only farmers would drive them, no teenager would want to be seen in one.

    And size usually equals weight once again it will bring up emissions and car tax.

    I did a quick look at bmws.se and compared a 220i with a 220d same displacement engines in the same car using the same gearboxes.

    TDI and DCT's exists to lower CO2 emissions, and car taxes is aggressively connected to CO2 emissions to try to reduce global warming.

    BMW 220i (petrol)
    135kw/184hp
    270Nm 1250-4500rpm
    CO2
    138-134g/km (DCT)
    146-142g/km (MT)


    BMW 220d (diesel)
    140kw/190hp
    400Nm 1750-2500rpm
    CO2
    107-99g/km (DCT)
    115-107g/km (MT)
    Click here to enlarge
    997.1 tt
    Kline 200cell exhaust
    997.2/GT2RS IC's
    Cobb E85 custom stage3 tune by Mitch
    ID1000 injectors
    Sachs stage 2.5 clutch

  4. #29
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Netherlands
    Posts
    6,531
    Rep Points
    6,489.0
    Mentioned
    103 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    65


    Yes Reputation No
    There are two theories to arguing with women. Neither one works

  5. #30
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    ATL
    Posts
    3,192
    Rep Points
    2.1
    Mentioned
    18 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    0


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by xbox_fan Click here to enlarge
    EU car tax tries to favour low emission cars in each class, you probably never seen a Audi Q7 with the V12 500hp diesel in the US, not in production anymore but hardly a "tiny" engine.

    Size for size diesels have higher hp/tq numbers at lower CO2 emissions.

    European cities are built mostly before the car was invented, it is seriously impractical to drive large cars. And pick-up's are considered lorry's here i.e. only farmers would drive them, no teenager would want to be seen in one.

    And size usually equals weight once again it will bring up emissions and car tax.

    I did a quick look at bmws.se and compared a 220i with a 220d same displacement engines in the same car using the same gearboxes.

    TDI and DCT's exists to lower CO2 emissions, and car taxes is aggressively connected to CO2 emissions to try to reduce global warming.

    BMW 220i (petrol)
    135kw/184hp
    270Nm 1250-4500rpm
    CO2
    138-134g/km (DCT)
    146-142g/km (MT)


    BMW 220d (diesel)
    140kw/190hp
    400Nm 1750-2500rpm
    CO2
    107-99g/km (DCT)
    115-107g/km (MT)
    Sweden is more strict I think than the rest of Europe right? The problem with European emissions laws is they place too much emphasis on only CO2 and not the other components of emissions. Like particulate and NOx which cause ground level ozone and smog which is very bad for respiratory health. Cities like Paris have very poor air quality compared to US cities I have seen.

  6. #31
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    1,108
    Rep Points
    1,407.0
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    15


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by subaru335i Click here to enlarge
    Sweden is more strict I think than the rest of Europe right? The problem with European emissions laws is they place too much emphasis on only CO2 and not the other components of emissions. Like particulate and NOx which cause ground level ozone and smog which is very bad for respiratory health. Cities like Paris have very poor air quality compared to US cities I have seen.
    Pretty sure there is no diesels sold without particle-filters anymore. NOx is bad but a lesser bad than global warming. Direct injected petrol engines has higher levels of particulate emmisions than traditional PI. But I assume soon internal combustion engines will be track-only much like horse riding.
    Click here to enlarge
    997.1 tt
    Kline 200cell exhaust
    997.2/GT2RS IC's
    Cobb E85 custom stage3 tune by Mitch
    ID1000 injectors
    Sachs stage 2.5 clutch

  7. #32
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by xbox_fan Click here to enlarge
    EU car tax tries to favour low emission cars in each class, you probably never seen a Audi Q7 with the V12 500hp diesel in the US, not in production anymore but hardly a "tiny" engine.
    That's right and you won't see it in the US as it will never pass emissions.

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by xbox_fan Click here to enlarge
    European cities are built mostly before the car was invented, it is seriously impractical to drive large cars. And pick-up's are considered lorry's here i.e. only farmers would drive them, no teenager would want to be seen in one.
    That hardly applies to every European city. Plus quite a bit of them have been destroyed and rebuilt through wars and so forth. While in general you can walk more in Europe the 'town center' aspect isn't what it used to be as cities get bigger and more people can afford cars now.

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by xbox_fan Click here to enlarge
    TDI and DCT's exists to lower CO2 emissions, and car taxes is aggressively connected to CO2 emissions to try to reduce global warming.
    Look it doesn't matter diesel isn't a cleaner design.

  8. #33
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    1,108
    Rep Points
    1,407.0
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    15


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    That's right and you won't see it in the US as it will never pass emissions.

    That hardly applies to every European city. Plus quite a bit of them have been destroyed and rebuilt through wars and so forth. While in general you can walk more in Europe the 'town center' aspect isn't what it used to be as cities get bigger and more people can afford cars

    Look it doesn't matter diesel isn't a cleaner design.
    Diesels emitts more NOx and particles than petrol but much less CO2. And since global warming is the biggest problem vs smog they are a lesser bad.

    Big cars in general isn't popular in EU for several reasons, there isn't really any market for them. In most cities public transportation is for most ppl faster and simpler than taking the car.

    Personally I need a big car (4 kids), but a Surburban i.e. would be stupid expensive to tax (CO2 emmision based tax), I can't park it anywhere (since parking spots are the size of an Aygo) and resell value is very low (since very few ppl wants a car this size)
    Click here to enlarge
    997.1 tt
    Kline 200cell exhaust
    997.2/GT2RS IC's
    Cobb E85 custom stage3 tune by Mitch
    ID1000 injectors
    Sachs stage 2.5 clutch

  9. #34
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    1,108
    Rep Points
    1,407.0
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    15


    Yes Reputation No
    @Sticky A 2016 Toyota Auris (VW Golf sized) list price starts at $25k in Sweden. In the US a Ford Explorer list price starts at $30k.

    Cars are cheap in the US, wish I could convince the wife to move...
    Click here to enlarge
    997.1 tt
    Kline 200cell exhaust
    997.2/GT2RS IC's
    Cobb E85 custom stage3 tune by Mitch
    ID1000 injectors
    Sachs stage 2.5 clutch

  10. #35
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by xbox_fan Click here to enlarge
    Diesels emitts more NOx and particles than petrol but much less CO2. And since global warming is the biggest problem vs smog they are a lesser bad.
    But NOx is more dangerous to human beings.

    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by xbox_fan Click here to enlarge
    Big cars in general isn't popular in EU for several reasons, there isn't really any market for them. In most cities public transportation is for most ppl faster and simpler than taking the car.
    Yep. Plus smaller distances. Americans have more of a car culture.

  11. #36
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    1,108
    Rep Points
    1,407.0
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    15


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    But NOx is more dangerous to human beings.
    And here is where VW decided to cheat, other manufacturers use expensive tech to lower NOx emmisions from their diesels, but to save approx. 400$ per car VW "solved it" with software...
    Click here to enlarge
    997.1 tt
    Kline 200cell exhaust
    997.2/GT2RS IC's
    Cobb E85 custom stage3 tune by Mitch
    ID1000 injectors
    Sachs stage 2.5 clutch

  12. #37
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by xbox_fan Click here to enlarge
    And here is where VW decided to cheat, other manufacturers use expensive tech to lower NOx emmisions from their diesels, but to save approx. 400$ per car VW "solved it" with software...
    Right. But that doesn't make diesels cleaner and in general diesel fuel contains more oil and it is tougher for them to meet American emission standards. Which is why VW cheated the EPA.

  13. #38
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    1,108
    Rep Points
    1,407.0
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    15


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    Right. But that doesn't make diesels cleaner and in general diesel fuel contains more oil and it is tougher for them to meet American emission standards. Which is why VW cheated the EPA.
    yes, the fuel in itself is worse than petrol and requires a more complicated engine. But I still think it's a viable solution to lower CO2 emmisions
    Click here to enlarge
    997.1 tt
    Kline 200cell exhaust
    997.2/GT2RS IC's
    Cobb E85 custom stage3 tune by Mitch
    ID1000 injectors
    Sachs stage 2.5 clutch

  14. #39
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    148,075
    Rep Points
    47,180.7
    Mentioned
    2523 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    472



    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by xbox_fan Click here to enlarge
    yes, the fuel in itself is worse than petrol and requires a more complicated engine. But I still think it's a viable solution to lower CO2 emmisions
    I think there definitely is merit to diesel motors and they definitely have application and can be clean.

    Unfortunately this VW mess is going to set diesel back in the USA.

  15. #40
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    1,108
    Rep Points
    1,407.0
    Mentioned
    16 Post(s)
    Rep Power
    15


    Yes Reputation No
    Click here to enlarge Originally Posted by Sticky Click here to enlarge
    I think there definitely is merit to diesel motors and they definitely have application and can be clean.

    Unfortunately this VW mess is going to set diesel back in the USA.
    Lol 11/02/2015: EPA, California Notify Volkswagen of Additional Clean Air Act Violations

    http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress...257EF10061867B

    They really screwed up, Cayenne & Touareg also on the naughty list!

    Affected diesel models include:

    -- 2014 VW Touareg
    -- 2015 Porsche Cayenne
    -- 2016 Audi A6 Quattro, A7 Quattro, A8, A8L, and Q5
    Click here to enlarge
    997.1 tt
    Kline 200cell exhaust
    997.2/GT2RS IC's
    Cobb E85 custom stage3 tune by Mitch
    ID1000 injectors
    Sachs stage 2.5 clutch

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •