Results 176 to 197 of 197
Thread: Lets talk Turbo sizing
-
07-17-2011, 03:34 PM #176Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Bay Area
- Posts
- 977
- Rep Points
- 779.1
- Mentioned
- 5 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 8
maybe someone like 5nail5 can chime in. i'm trying to weigh options on a new turbo. might as well 'go small, or go home'. if what i'm hearing from commanderwiggin and a few others that a difference between a 67mm & 71 are negligible than the 67 must be a jack of all trades and a master at none.
so how much sooner can i expect to hit full boost on a 6265? and would a 6262 be more pronounced or is it similar to comparing a 67 & 71 as far as spool?
and i still would like to know more on limitations on boosted high compression setups. couldn't i decrease the threshold for methanol or start mixing 110L into my pump gas?
-
07-17-2011, 03:45 PM #177Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 885
- Rep Points
- 8.0
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 0
A 6262 is essentially a precision GT35R. It spools quite fast. However, it'll fall off since the S54 revs so high. If you don't mind some torque fall off up high go with the 6262 prob ~600 rwhp turbo on an S54. If you want a bit more go with a 6265 it'll outspool a 6765 but will flow slightly less at max. A 6765 is a nice turbo, but its lag threshold is ever so slightly earlier than a 71. 6262 is a like 675 bhp turbo, and a 6265 is like 700 - 725 bhp or so. Next step up from 6265 is the 6765 at about 755 bhp. So that bump in comp wheel size adds a smidge of lag, a bit more power, but not much. If you go to the billet 6765 (CEA) then its a 900 bhp turbo. That might be exactly what you want.
But, take a look at what HPF did with twins. That high revving motor simply cannot work with small fast spooling turbos. I know I've beat this topic to death @ CCykes, but its a perfect example. They got that "road race, low torque" bump in the dyno, but look how rapidly the power falls off.
-
07-17-2011, 10:38 PM #178Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 387
- Rep Points
- 237.0
- Mentioned
- 7 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 3
-
07-17-2011, 10:40 PM #179Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 387
- Rep Points
- 237.0
- Mentioned
- 7 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 3
Usually when people are talking about 6262's/6265's and 6765's/6768's they are all talking about the Billet wheel turbos....
-
07-17-2011, 10:52 PM #180
-
07-18-2011, 01:42 AM #181Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 387
- Rep Points
- 237.0
- Mentioned
- 7 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 3
-
07-18-2011, 07:04 AM #182Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 885
- Rep Points
- 8.0
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 0
-
07-18-2011, 07:13 AM #183
-
07-18-2011, 07:18 AM #184
-
07-18-2011, 03:43 PM #185Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 387
- Rep Points
- 237.0
- Mentioned
- 7 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 3
-
07-18-2011, 03:54 PM #186Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 387
- Rep Points
- 237.0
- Mentioned
- 7 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 3
-
07-20-2011, 04:51 AM #187
-
07-20-2011, 06:39 AM #188Member
- Join Date
- Mar 2010
- Posts
- 1,964
- Rep Points
- 1,586.1
- Mentioned
- 13 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 16
-
07-20-2011, 08:17 AM #189Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 885
- Rep Points
- 8.0
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 0
-
07-20-2011, 03:40 PM #190Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Bay Area
- Posts
- 977
- Rep Points
- 779.1
- Mentioned
- 5 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 8
tell me more about the 6765 CEA because if i understand the 6262/6265 right i'll have a lil bump down low but have an even bigger slump up top compared to my current setup. i want to try to avoid having much fall off at the top end, and if it does i want it high enough in rpm that it hardly gets pushed out of efficiency during spirited driving (i.e. ~7-7.3k rpm).
as it stands now it falls off too early on paper but it really hasn't bothered me. i've only noticed its softer at the bottom compared to my old stage 2 (low comp to blame?) which is why i bumped this thread because i feel there's room for improvement.
-
07-21-2011, 12:34 AM #191Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 387
- Rep Points
- 237.0
- Mentioned
- 7 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 3
Like ive already said, look up Supras with a 6262/6265 and 6765/6768 and you will see how the M3 will react since they are very close in displacement
-
07-21-2011, 01:11 AM #192Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 387
- Rep Points
- 237.0
- Mentioned
- 7 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 3
-
08-04-2011, 10:52 AM #193Member
- Join Date
- Oct 2010
- Posts
- 885
- Rep Points
- 8.0
- Mentioned
- 1 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 0
-
08-04-2011, 05:11 PM #194Member
- Join Date
- Aug 2010
- Location
- Bay Area
- Posts
- 977
- Rep Points
- 779.1
- Mentioned
- 5 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 8
-
08-04-2011, 08:17 PM #195
-
08-04-2011, 09:51 PM #196Member
- Join Date
- Dec 2010
- Posts
- 387
- Rep Points
- 237.0
- Mentioned
- 7 Post(s)
- Rep Power
- 3
Yeah there is a good chance it is, i was just pointing out that would help you decide..
If you are interested, i have a used HTA T3 3586 for sale. It came off my Coworkers Evo that made 793whp on E85 and still had a bit left in it... If anyones interested give me a call at the shop English Racing 360-210-7484.. GG did you get one yet?
-
08-05-2011, 05:13 PM #197
Welcome...
Let's point and laugh at alpinaturbo